📊bigdata-financial-research-analyst
- プラグイン
- bigdata-com
- ソース
- GitHub で見る ↗
説明
Bigdata.com の MCP ワークフローに機関投資家向け分析レイヤーを統合したツールです。 事前統合済みの EPIC スタイルフィルタリング、バリュエーションスナップショット、利益の質スクリーニング、経済的堀/ガバナンスリスク評価、セクター KPI レンズを備えています。 次のような場合に使用: - 企業概要レポート、決算プレビュー/ダイジェスト、リスク評価、バリュエーションスナップショット、投資メモの作成 - マクロ視点でのセクター/国別/地域別/テーマ別分析 - 株式分析、DCF や倍率を用いたバリュエーション概念の整理、レッドフラグの特定、投資テーゼの構築 M&A アービトラージ、アクティビズム、ディストレスト投資、ショート戦略、スピンオフなどのイベントドリブン高度トピックは、ユーザーが明示的に要求した場合に限り、株式分析リファレンスから提供されます。 **トリガーワード例:** 決算プレビュー/ダイジェスト、リスク評価、「X の適正価値は?」、経済見通し、G7、株式分析、バリュエーション、同業他社比較
原文を表示
Bigdata.com MCP workflows plus institutional analysis layers: pre-synthesis EPIC-style filtering, valuation snapshots, earnings quality screens, moat/governance risk, sector KPI lenses. Use for: company briefs, earnings previews/digests, risk assessments, valuation snapshots, investment memos; macro sector/country/regional/thematic analysis; stock analysis, DCF or multiples concepts, red flags, thesis construction. Advanced event-driven topics (M&A arb, activism, distressed, shorts, spin-offs) live in equity-analysis references when users ask explicitly. Triggers: earnings preview/digest, risk assessment, "what is X worth", economic outlook, G7, analyze stock, valuation, peers.
ユースケース
- ✓企業概要レポート・決算プレビューを作成する
- ✓リスク評価・バリュエーション分析を行う
- ✓セクター・国別・地域別分析を実施する
- ✓投資テーゼを構築・検証する
- ✓レッドフラグを特定する
本文
Bigdata.com financial analysis and equity research
This skill combines structured Bigdata.com workflows (private/public company and macro deliverables) with institutional-style equity analysis (intrinsic value, variant perception, valuation, and quality checks). Use Bigdata.com MCP tools for data; apply the equity layers when the user wants depth beyond a standard template.
Identify the right company
If the user provides a company name, call find_securities first to get the entity id. If the name is ambiguous, respond with:
"I found multiple companies named [X]. Did you mean [Company A] in [Industry] or [Company B] in [Industry]?"
Analysis categories
Read the appropriate reference file for the request:
| Category | When to use | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Public company | Briefs, previews, digests, risk, valuation snapshot; always apply references/public_company/analytical-frameworks.md before synthesizing | references/public_company/main.md |
| Private company | Upcoming (not-yet-listed) IPOs, S-1/F-1 analysis, planned listings — balanced bull/bear note, no buy/avoid call | references/private_company/pre-ipo-analysis.md |
| Macro economics | Sector/country/regional/thematic analysis, rotation, cross-asset views | references/macro/main.md |
| Institutional equity | Deep thesis, full DCF/SOTP write-ups, forensic accounting, sector playbooks, advanced special situations | references/equity-analysis/main.md |
Routing examples
- "Create an earnings preview for NVIDIA" → Public company
- "Risk assessment for Tesla" → Public company
- "What's happening with Apple?" → Public company
- "Analyze the IPO of [company]", "S-1 analysis", "upcoming listing for [company]" → Private company
- "Post-IPO day 1 for [company]", "NASDAQ-100 inclusion impact", "180-day lock-up expiry", "366-day founder lock-up / float expansion" → Public company (post-IPO event notes — see references/public_company/post-ipo-common.md)
- "Analyze the US technology sector" → Macro economics
- "Economic outlook for Germany" → Macro economics
- "Compare G7 economies" → Macro economics
- "Macro analysis of financials in India" → Macro economics
- "What is Tesla worth?", "valuation snapshot for Apple" → Public company valuation-snapshot.md
- "DCF on Microsoft", "full sum-of-parts", "M&A arb on [deal]", deep forensic accounting → Institutional equity (often plus public-company data steps)
Data foundation (MCP)
Establish a factual base before deep analysis:
find_securities→ entity id and company type (public/private) where applicablebigdata_company_tearsheet→ financials, estimates, sentiment, ESG (when analyzing a specific company)bigdata_search→ news, filings, transcripts, analyst/economic coveragebigdata_events_calendar→ upcoming earnings and conferences (when entity id is available)
For macro / country work, use bigdata_country_tearsheet when available; follow fallbacks in references/macro/main.md.
Core philosophy (full equity thesis / memo)
When producing an investment-style view, anchor on:
- Intrinsic value — estimate business value independent of price
- Variant perception — state clearly where your view differs from consensus
- Quality over quantity — prioritize the few drivers that matter
Earnings preview — mandatory sections
When following references/public_company/earnings-preview.md, treat as mandatory: EPIC table for primary drivers, FaVeS section (Fundamentals / Valuation / Sentiment), Sentiment & positioning data table (tearsheet + search), scenario analysis (bull/base/bear probabilities, prices, probability-weighted EV with math shown), watch-for column on earnings quality, and regulatory/legal search bucket.
Investment thesis workflow (when depth is appropriate)
Use this for comprehensive stock analysis or investment memos—not every brief or digest needs every step.
Step 1: Company and data
Use the Data foundation section above.
Step 2: What matters (EPIC)
| Test | Question | Pass criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Effect | Is it material? | ~10% change moves intrinsic value meaningfully (e.g. >5%) |
| Predictability | Can you forecast it? | You have analytical or information edge |
| Independence | Does consensus get it wrong? | Market systematically misjudges this |
| Consensus gap | Is there a gap? | Your forecast differs meaningfully |
Focus on factors that pass all four. Detail: references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/epic-framework.md.
Step 3: Variant perception (FaVeS)
| Element | Key questions |
|---|---|
| Fundamentals | Which 2–3 KPIs drive value? Where could estimates be wrong? |
| Valuation | What is intrinsic value? What multiple fits quality/growth? |
| Sentiment | What is priced in (e.g. reverse DCF)? How are investors positioned? |
You must articulate where you differ from consensus. Detail: references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/faves-framework.md.
Step 4: Quality and risk (before valuation)
Quick earnings quality screen: OCF/NI (healthy typically >0.8; red flag <0.6 or diverging trends); accruals; DSO vs revenue trend.
Competitive position: Moat type/strength (moat taxonomy), ROIC vs WACC, competitive advantage period.
Management: Capital allocation, insider activity, guidance track record (capital allocation).
Step 5: Value and recommend
| Company type | Primary | Secondary check |
|---|---|---|
| Stable, profitable | DCF (FCFF) | EV/EBITDA, P/E |
| High-growth, pre-profit | EV/Revenue; DCF with long CAP | Reverse DCF |
| Bank / insurer | P/TBV; dividend discount | P/E, residual income |
| REIT | NAV; P/AFFO | Implied cap rate |
| Conglomerate | Sum-of-parts | Holdco discount |
| Distressed | Liquidation / recovery | Asset coverage |
Build bull/base/bear with explicit assumptions and probability weights where appropriate.
Output templates (equity-style)
| User pattern | Template |
|---|---|
| Comprehensive "analyze [company]" / investment memo | assets/templates/investment-memo.md |
| "Quick view" / "what do you think of [stock]" | assets/templates/quick-take.md |
| Post-earnings reaction note | assets/templates/earnings-reaction.md |
| Pre-IPO / upcoming-listing research note | assets/templates/pre-ipo-report-template.md |
| Post-IPO day-1 reaction note | assets/templates/post-ipo-day1-report-template.md |
| Post-IPO day-14 NASDAQ-100 inclusion note | assets/templates/post-ipo-day14-report-template.md |
| Post-IPO day-179 (180-day lock-up expiry) note | assets/templates/post-ipo-day179-report-template.md |
| Post-IPO day-365 (366-day founder lock-up / float expansion) note | assets/templates/post-ipo-day365-report-template.md |
Sector playbooks: after you know the industry, use references/equity-analysis/sector-routing.md.
Scripts (optional quantitative helpers)
Default: use bigdata_company_tearsheet, bigdata_search, and workflow steps (including valuation cross-checks and reverse-DCF reasoning) without running local Python.
Use the scripts below only when the user explicitly wants spreadsheet-style model output or offline quant; run from the skill’s scripts/ directory (or paths your environment expects).
| Script | Purpose | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| scripts/dcf_model.py | DCF with scenarios | User asks for built model / explicit scenarios |
| scripts/reverse_dcf.py | Implied growth extraction | User asks for scripted reverse DCF |
| scripts/earnings_quality.py | Beneish M-Score, accruals | User asks for scripted quality metrics |
| scripts/peer_comparable.py | Comp table | User asks for scripted comps |
| scripts/scenario_probability.py | Expected value | User asks for scripted EV across scenarios |
Quality standards
For investment memo / full thesis-style outputs, include where relevant:
- Clear recommendation and conviction (e.g. 1–5)
- Explicit variant perception vs consensus
- Scenarios with probabilities and price targets (or ranges)
- Key risks and what would change the view
- Catalysts and timing
For workflow deliverables (brief, preview, digest, risk, valuation snapshot), follow references/public_company/ and references/public_company/main.md universal output quality (PM questions: what’s different, what matters, what to do—no position sizing). Add full thesis elements only when the user asks.
Bars: Full thesis → concise institutional review. Workflow → morning-meeting clarity without data-dump tone.
Capabilities overview
When a user says "Can you help me with a financial report?" or similar, respond with:
I can help automate research workflows and professional deliverables:
Public company — Company briefs, earnings previews/digests, risk assessments, investment-style memos when requested
Macro — Sector analysis, country profiles, regional comparisons, thematic research, rotation, cross-asset angles
Equity depth — Deep valuation write-ups, forensics, sector playbooks, advanced special situations (see equity-analysis index)Example: "Earnings preview for NVIDIA", "Valuation snapshot for Apple", "Economic outlook for Germany", or "Full DCF thesis for [ticker]."
Universal best practices
- Before long-form synthesis on a company, read references/public_company/analytical-frameworks.md (EPIC-style filter, 2–3 drivers, quality over quantity).
bigdata_searchcan be used with the company (or topic) in the query;find_securitiesfirst when you need a tearsheet or calendar.- Use
bigdata_company_tearsheetfor a financial baseline on a specific entity. - Call
bigdata_searchmultiple times with focused queries for coverage. - Separate facts from analysis / implications.
Output formats
- Markdown — Default. At the end, you may ask whether the user wants a report.
- Word (.docx) — Formal memos.
- Presentation — Deck-ready structure.
- Footer — Every workflow deliverable must end with the Powered by Bigdata.com attribution and Disclaimer in assets/templates/report-footer.md (verbatim).
For macro workflows, follow source attribution rules in references/macro/main.md where they apply.
Further reference
Full institutional equity index (valuation, forensics, sectors, advanced special situations): references/equity-analysis/main.md.
原文・著作権は Anthropic および各プラグイン作者に帰属します。日本語訳は Claude API による自動翻訳です。