Testing MWAA Workflows

AWS MCP server (optional but recommended): running the AWS CLI commands in this skill through the AWS MCP server gives sandboxed execution and audit logging. Every command here also works with the plain AWS CLI, so the skill does not require the MCP server or any MCP-only tools.

Test Amazon MWAA workflow execution end-to-end: trigger a run, poll it to a terminal state, and on failure drive a capped debug -> fix -> retest loop. This skill triggers and reads state only; it delegates every diagnosis to debugging-mwaa-workflow and every mutation (artifact edit, redeploy, environment create/update) to authoring-mwaa-workflow. Routes by flavor, then runs one shared spine.

Execution note — poll in discrete steps: whenever you wait for an AWS operation to reach a terminal or ready state, issue one status check per call and decide in your own loop whether to check again. Never block a single command or script on the wait (no while+sleep until done), regardless of the operation or how long it takes.

Guardrail — where this skill's own files live (MCP vs local install)

This skill can be loaded two ways, and they resolve the skill's own bundled files from different places. Determine how the skill was loaded before reading a reference:

• Loaded through the AWS MCP retrieve_skill tool: The skill is not installed on the local filesystem. You MUST fetch each reference via retrieve_skill with the file parameter (e.g. file="references/provisioned-testing.md") and read the returned content. Do NOT file_read these paths locally — they do not exist on disk.
• Installed locally (e.g. .kiro/skills/testing-mwaa-workflow/ or ~/.claude/skills/testing-mwaa-workflow/): Read the files from the local skill directory using relative paths.

This distinction applies only to the skill's own packaged files. User data and session artifacts are always read from and written to the user's working directory. Never fetch or write customer data through retrieve_skill.

Step 0: Detect Flavor, Mode, and Complexity

Flavor (reuse debugging's logic)

1. An environment name resolvable via aws mwaa get-environment -> Provisioned.
2. A workflow/... ARN or any aws mwaa-serverless context -> Serverless.
3. Neither signal -> ask: MWAA Provisioned (Python DAG) or MWAA Serverless (YAML workflow)?

Invocation mode

• Standalone — the user points at an existing, already-deployed target.
• Delegated — authoring-mwaa-workflow deployed and handed over the resolved target (env name + dag_id, or workflow ARN). Its "deploy and test now?" approval satisfies the first trigger confirmation only.

Complexity

• Simple — target already deployed and known-ready -> skip to Step 2.
• Standard — just deployed, readiness unknown -> full spine.
• Complex — retest inside an active fix loop.

Step 1: Readiness Check (before the first trigger)

Confirm the artifact is deployed and parse-ready. Do not trigger blind. This step is MANDATORY even when you plan to adopt an existing run — the readiness data (last_parsed_time, is_active, has_import_errors) feeds the freshness gate in Step 2.

• Provisioned: confirm dag_id present with has_import_errors: false, then apply the version-aware ready check via the /dags collection endpoint. Determine the poll window from the environment's configured scan interval: check get-environment -> AirflowConfigurationOptions for scheduler.dag_dir_list_interval (AF2) or dag_processor.refresh_interval (AF3). If unset, default to 300s. Poll up to that interval + 30s at 15s intervals (the per-DAG endpoint can lag). On AF2 (REST API v1) require is_active: true. On AF3 (REST API v2) the is_active field does not exist — require is_stale: false instead and never wait on is_active (it reads as absent/false forever). A DAG that is parsed but not yet ready will reject trigger attempts with an opaque RestApiClientException. Not ready in time -> hand to debugging-mwaa-workflow.
• Serverless: confirm WorkflowStatus is READY (via get-workflow --workflow-arn). Not ready -> hand to debugging-mwaa-workflow.

This readiness window is separate from the Step 3 run timeout. See references/provisioned-testing.md and references/serverless-testing.md for exact commands.

Step 2: Confirm, then Trigger (safety gate)

State the resolved target and classify its environment. Unless you are certain it is a development/test environment (name or tags clearly indicate dev/test), treat it as production: emit a prod warning and require explicit user confirmation before triggering. If the target is confirmed production (name or tags contain prod, prd, or production, or the user says so), require explicit approval at every state-changing step — each trigger, re-trigger, and clear/rerun — not just once. For a target you are certain is dev/test, require explicit user confirmation before the first trigger and each re-trigger.

This gate is already satisfied when the user has given explicit approval for the action: in delegated mode the authoring "deploy and test now?" approval covers the first trigger, and an explicit pre-authorization to trigger a specific run counts as that confirmation — do not re-ask when approval has already been given.

Before triggering, check for scheduler-created runs (see provisioned-testing reference). Apply the freshness gate before adopting any prior run:

• Delegated mode: always trigger fresh. Prior runs predate the deployment by definition — do not adopt regardless of state.
• Standalone mode: compare run.start_date against dag.last_parsed_time read from the /dags collection response the Step 1 readiness check already fetches (the collection returns last_parsed_time per DAG in both v1 and v2 — no per-DAG call needed). If start_date < last_parsed_time, the run tested a prior artifact version — treat as stale, trigger fresh. Only adopt runs where start_date >= last_parsed_time.

For fresh, non-stale runs that pass the gate: if a run already exists for the target interval, adopt it instead of POSTing. Monitor through Step 3.

On a retest, all run identifiers must be fresh (Provisioned: both dag_run_id and logical_date; Serverless: new start-workflow-run call). Before re-triggering, confirm every prior run is terminal — a still-running prior run can block the new one from starting.

See references for exact trigger commands and retest hygiene.

Step 3: Poll to Terminal

Poll the triggered run until it reaches a terminal state. See references for exact poll commands and error fallbacks.

Timeout handling:

• Provisioned with dagrun_timeout set: if elapsed time exceeds dagrun_timeout and the run is still not terminal, treat as failure -> Step 4. (dagrun_timeout is a DAG-level Airflow parameter and does not apply to MWAA Serverless.)
• Serverless: poll until the service returns a terminal state — no caller ceiling is needed, because the MWAA Serverless service enforces its own run cap and surfaces it as the TIMEOUT terminal state.
• Provisioned without dagrun_timeout: there is no DAG- or service-level deadline, so agree a maximum wait with the user before polling (they know the DAG's expected runtime; default to 1h if they have no preference). Poll until terminal OR the maximum wait elapses. On reaching the cap, stop polling and report — do not silently mark it failed, and do not keep polling unbounded:

  Run <run-id> has not reached a terminal state within the agreed <max-wait>. It may still be running — I have not failed it. Choose: (a) extend the wait, (b) inspect logs / the Airflow UI, or (c) treat this test as inconclusive.

Poll interval scales with elapsed time:

Elapsed time	Poll interval
<= 5 min	15s
> 5-15 min	30s
> 15-30 min	60s
> 30-60 min	2 min
> 60 min	5 min

Pass = terminal SUCCESS only; no output-data inspection. On pass -> Step 6.

Step 4: On Failure, Delegate to Debugging

Hand the run identifiers to debugging-mwaa-workflow. It returns its standard structure (Root Cause / Impact / Immediate Fix / Prevention / Commands). Do not re-diagnose here.

Step 5: Classify Fixes and Loop

5a. Classify each action item debugging returns into one bucket:

Bucket	Examples	Handling
ARTIFACT	wrong operator param, missing import, bad YAML schema/timedelta, wrong task wiring, Serverless code-package fix (missing dep / wrong-platform wheel / bad zip layout)	Delegate to authoring-mwaa-workflow: regenerate the compliant artifact (and rebuild/redeploy the --code package for Serverless), then redeploy. Auto-continue.
ENVIRONMENT	requirements.txt dependency, plugins.zip, env config / worker sizing	Delegate to authoring's deploy path (owns env mutation + its own approval). Auto-continue after that gate.
HUMAN-GATED	new IAM permission, VPC/networking, missing data asset, quota increase	Cannot be auto-applied. Present exact commands, pause the loop, wait for the user to confirm resolution before any retest.

Testing never mutates directly.

5b. Re-test. After an auto-fixable bucket is applied and redeployed, loop back to Step 1 (redeploy triggers a fresh S3-sync/parse) -> Step 2 (re-confirm) -> Step 3. Apply Step 2's re-trigger hygiene: fresh dag_run_id and logical_date, and confirm the prior run is terminal (not just still retry-backing-off) before the new trigger.

5c. Mixed action items in one cycle (parallel). Kick off the auto-fixable fixes (regenerate + redeploy via authoring) and present the human-gated items at the same time; do not fully serialize. Two guardrails: (1) gate the retest on both completing — do not re-trigger until auto-fixes are redeployed and the user confirms the human-gated items; (2) if an auto-fix depends on a human-gated item (the regenerated artifact references a resource/permission the user must create first), sequence them instead of parallelizing.

5d. Loop cap and stop conditions. The cap counts attempts without progress, not raw attempts — default 3 (override "retry up to N"). Define progress as either: a task that failed before now reaches SUCCESS (the pipeline advanced), or debugging reports a different root cause than the prior attempt. An attempt that makes progress resets the counter — a multi-task pipeline that clears one blocker per run is advancing, and a hard raw-count cap would abandon it mid-repair. Stop and summarize when any of: (1) run reaches SUCCESS -> Step 6 pass; (2) the no-progress counter hits the cap; (3) a HUMAN-GATED item -> pause for the user. Two consecutive runs with the same root cause count as one no-progress increment each — that is the counter advancing, not a separate rule.

Step 6: Report

Test Result: PASS | FAIL | STOPPED (<reason>)
Target: <env-name + dag_id | workflow ARN>  [PROD WARNING if applicable]
Attempts: <n>/<cap>
Run History:
  Attempt 1: <run_id> -> <state> (<duration>) [-> root cause if failed]
Fixes Applied: <artifact/env fixes auto-applied via authoring, per attempt> | none
Outstanding Action Items: <human-gated items, exact commands> | none
Next Step: <re-invoke to retest after resolving | passed, nothing needed>

PASS requires terminal SUCCESS. STOPPED covers cap-reached / no-progress / human-gated-pause, each named explicitly.

Gotchas

• A freshly deployed artifact is not immediately runnable — it must sync from S3 and parse (Provisioned) or was validated at create/update (Serverless). Step 1 is mandatory before the first trigger unless complexity is Simple.
• This skill never edits an artifact, changes requirements, or creates/updates an environment. Those are authoring-mwaa-workflow's job and carry its approval gates. Testing only triggers (confirmed) and reads state.
• Pass is run-state SUCCESS only. Output-data correctness is out of scope.

Troubleshooting

Symptom	Cause	Action
DAG absent from GET /dags	S3-sync lag or import error	Hand to debugging-mwaa-workflow before triggering
--path rejected / truncated	Path over 64 chars (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/reference/mwaa/invoke-rest-api.html)	Poll the collection path with --query-parameters
RestApiClientException on poll	Web server unreachable	Fall back to DAGProcessing/Scheduler log groups
RestApiClientException on dagRuns POST (empty message)	DAG not ready — AF2: is_active=false (activation incomplete); AF3: is_stale=true (is_active does not exist in v2)	Poll /dags collection until ready (AF2 is_active=true / AF3 is_stale=false); do not retry the trigger blind
Manual run created but stuck in queued, never starts (AF3)	DAG is paused — AF3 does not execute manual runs while paused (AF2 does)	Unpause (PATCH /dags/<dag_id> {"is_paused": false}) then trigger; common right after an upgrade where DAGs are deployed paused
Serverless get-workflow not READY	Still creating/updating or failed	Wait for READY; if FAILED, hand to debugging
Same failure two attempts running	Fix not addressing root cause	Stop at no-progress; summarize; do not burn the cap

References

• references/provisioned-testing.md — exact invoke-rest-api commands (readiness, trigger, poll), 64-char path limit, retest hygiene, log fallback
• references/serverless-testing.md — exact mwaa-serverless commands (get-workflow, start-workflow-run, get-workflow-run), terminal states

Security Considerations

• Triggers real runs (state-changing): every trigger and re-trigger requires explicit confirmation; prod-named targets get a warning first.
• No autonomous mutation: the skill never edits artifacts, requirements, or environments and never changes IAM — those are delegated to authoring (with its own gates). Human-gated fixes pause the loop for user action.
• No secret exposure: run and log inspection must not surface credentials or connection strings into output.