Bigdata.com MCP ワークフロー+機関投資家向け分析レイヤー:事前合成型EPIC方式フィルタリング(複数の分析視点の統合)、評価額スナップショット(特定時点の企業価値評価)、収益品質スクリーニング(利益の信頼度評価)、競争優位性/ガバナンスリスク、セクター別KPI(重要業績評価指標)レンズ。 **用途:** - 企業概要書、決算予想・決算まとめ、リスク評価、評価額スナップショット、投資メモ - マクロ分析(業界別、国別、地域別、テーマ別) - 株式分析、DCF法(現金流割引法)や倍数法の考察、危険信号の検出、投資論文の構築 より高度なイベント駆動型トピック(M&A裁定取引、アクティビズム、経営危機、空売り、スピンオフ)は、ユーザーが明確に要求した場合に株式分析リファレンスで提供されます。 **発動条件:** 決算予想・まとめ、リスク評価、「Xはいくら価値があるのか」、経済見通し、G7、株式分析、評価、競合企業との比較
Bigdata.com MCP workflows plus institutional analysis layers: pre-synthesis EPIC-style filtering, valuation snapshots, earnings quality screens, moat/governance risk, sector KPI lenses. Use for: company briefs, earnings previews/digests, risk assessments, valuation snapshots, investment memos; macro sector/country/regional/thematic analysis; stock analysis, DCF or multiples concepts, red flags, thesis construction. Advanced event-driven topics (M&A arb, activism, distressed, shorts, spin-offs) live in equity-analysis references when users ask explicitly. Triggers: earnings preview/digest, risk assessment, "what is X worth", economic outlook, G7, analyze stock, valuation, peers.
This skill combines structured Bigdata.com workflows (private/public company and macro deliverables) with institutional-style equity analysis (intrinsic value, variant perception, valuation, and quality checks). Use Bigdata.com MCP tools for data; apply the equity layers when the user wants depth beyond a standard template.
If the user provides a company name, call find_securities first to get the entity id. If the name is ambiguous, respond with:
"I found multiple companies named [X]. Did you mean [Company A] in [Industry] or [Company B] in [Industry]?"
Read the appropriate reference file for the request:
| Category | When to use | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Public company | Briefs, previews, digests, risk, valuation snapshot; always apply references/public_company/analytical-frameworks.md before synthesizing | references/public_company/main.md |
| Private company | Upcoming (not-yet-listed) IPOs, S-1/F-1 analysis, planned listings — balanced bull/bear note, no buy/avoid call | references/private_company/pre-ipo-analysis.md |
| Macro economics | Sector/country/regional/thematic analysis, rotation, cross-asset views | references/macro/main.md |
| Institutional equity | Deep thesis, full DCF/SOTP write-ups, forensic accounting, sector playbooks, advanced special situations | references/equity-analysis/main.md |
Establish a factual base before deep analysis:
find_securities → entity id and company type (public/private) where applicablebigdata_company_tearsheet → financials, estimates, sentiment, ESG (when analyzing a specific company)bigdata_search → news, filings, transcripts, analyst/economic coveragebigdata_events_calendar → upcoming earnings and conferences (when entity id is available)For macro / country work, use bigdata_country_tearsheet when available; follow fallbacks in references/macro/main.md.
When producing an investment-style view, anchor on:
When following references/public_company/earnings-preview.md, treat as mandatory: EPIC table for primary drivers, FaVeS section (Fundamentals / Valuation / Sentiment), Sentiment & positioning data table (tearsheet + search), scenario analysis (bull/base/bear probabilities, prices, probability-weighted EV with math shown), watch-for column on earnings quality, and regulatory/legal search bucket.
Use this for comprehensive stock analysis or investment memos—not every brief or digest needs every step.
Use the Data foundation section above.
| Test | Question | Pass criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Effect | Is it material? | ~10% change moves intrinsic value meaningfully (e.g. >5%) |
| Predictability | Can you forecast it? | You have analytical or information edge |
| Independence | Does consensus get it wrong? | Market systematically misjudges this |
| Consensus gap | Is there a gap? | Your forecast differs meaningfully |
Focus on factors that pass all four. Detail: references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/epic-framework.md.
| Element | Key questions |
|---|---|
| Fundamentals | Which 2–3 KPIs drive value? Where could estimates be wrong? |
| Valuation | What is intrinsic value? What multiple fits quality/growth? |
| Sentiment | What is priced in (e.g. reverse DCF)? How are investors positioned? |
You must articulate where you differ from consensus. Detail: references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/faves-framework.md.
Quick earnings quality screen: OCF/NI (healthy typically >0.8; red flag <0.6 or diverging trends); accruals; DSO vs revenue trend.
Competitive position: Moat type/strength (moat taxonomy), ROIC vs WACC, competitive advantage period.
Management: Capital allocation, insider activity, guidance track record (capital allocation).
| Company type | Primary | Secondary check |
|---|---|---|
| Stable, profitable | DCF (FCFF) | EV/EBITDA, P/E |
| High-growth, pre-profit | EV/Revenue; DCF with long CAP | Reverse DCF |
| Bank / insurer | P/TBV; dividend discount | P/E, residual income |
| REIT | NAV; P/AFFO | Implied cap rate |
| Conglomerate | Sum-of-parts | Holdco discount |
| Distressed | Liquidation / recovery | Asset coverage |
Build bull/base/bear with explicit assumptions and probability weights where appropriate.
| User pattern | Template |
|---|---|
| Comprehensive "analyze [company]" / investment memo | assets/templates/investment-memo.md |
| "Quick view" / "what do you think of [stock]" | assets/templates/quick-take.md |
| Post-earnings reaction note | assets/templates/earnings-reaction.md |
| Pre-IPO / upcoming-listing research note | assets/templates/pre-ipo-report-template.md |
| Post-IPO day-1 reaction note | assets/templates/post-ipo-day1-report-template.md |
| Post-IPO day-14 NASDAQ-100 inclusion note | assets/templates/post-ipo-day14-report-template.md |
| Post-IPO day-179 (180-day lock-up expiry) note | assets/templates/post-ipo-day179-report-template.md |
| Post-IPO day-365 (366-day founder lock-up / float expansion) note | assets/templates/post-ipo-day365-report-template.md |
Sector playbooks: after you know the industry, use references/equity-analysis/sector-routing.md.
Default: use bigdata_company_tearsheet, bigdata_search, and workflow steps (including valuation cross-checks and reverse-DCF reasoning) without running local Python.
Use the scripts below only when the user explicitly wants spreadsheet-style model output or offline quant; run from the skill’s scripts/ directory (or paths your environment expects).
| Script | Purpose | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| scripts/dcf_model.py | DCF with scenarios | User asks for built model / explicit scenarios |
| scripts/reverse_dcf.py | Implied growth extraction | User asks for scripted reverse DCF |
| scripts/earnings_quality.py | Beneish M-Score, accruals | User asks for scripted quality metrics |
| scripts/peer_comparable.py | Comp table | User asks for scripted comps |
| scripts/scenario_probability.py | Expected value | User asks for scripted EV across scenarios |
For investment memo / full thesis-style outputs, include where relevant:
For workflow deliverables (brief, preview, digest, risk, valuation snapshot), follow references/public_company/ and references/public_company/main.md universal output quality (PM questions: what’s different, what matters, what to do—no position sizing). Add full thesis elements only when the user asks.
Bars: Full thesis → concise institutional review. Workflow → morning-meeting clarity without data-dump tone.
When a user says "Can you help me with a financial report?" or similar, respond with:
I can help automate research workflows and professional deliverables:
Public company — Company briefs, earnings previews/digests, risk assessments, investment-style memos when requested
Macro — Sector analysis, country profiles, regional comparisons, thematic research, rotation, cross-asset angles
Equity depth — Deep valuation write-ups, forensics, sector playbooks, advanced special situations (see equity-analysis index)Example: "Earnings preview for NVIDIA", "Valuation snapshot for Apple", "Economic outlook for Germany", or "Full DCF thesis for [ticker]."
bigdata_search can be used with the company (or topic) in the query; find_securities first when you need a tearsheet or calendar.bigdata_company_tearsheet for a financial baseline on a specific entity.bigdata_search multiple times with focused queries for coverage.For macro workflows, follow source attribution rules in references/macro/main.md where they apply.
Full institutional equity index (valuation, forensics, sectors, advanced special situations): references/equity-analysis/main.md.
原文・著作権は Anthropic および各プラグイン作者に帰属します。日本語訳は Claude API による自動翻訳です。