• Projects
  • Service
  • About
  • branding.bz
  • Podcast
  • Tips
  • FAQ
  • Recruit
  • Download
  • Contact
  • branding.bz(ブランド構築SaaS)
  • DESIGN NOW(デザインメディア)
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Spotify
  • Facebook

213-0011 神奈川県川崎市高津区久本3-6-7-303

© 2026 ID INC. All rights reserved

claude-skills/スキル
SKILLKnowledge Work

bigdata-financial-research-analyst

プラグイン
Bigdata.com
ソース
GitHub で見る ↗
説明

Bigdata.com MCP ワークフロー+機関投資家向け分析レイヤー:事前合成型EPIC方式フィルタリング(複数の分析視点の統合)、評価額スナップショット(特定時点の企業価値評価)、収益品質スクリーニング(利益の信頼度評価)、競争優位性/ガバナンスリスク、セクター別KPI(重要業績評価指標)レンズ。 **用途:** - 企業概要書、決算予想・決算まとめ、リスク評価、評価額スナップショット、投資メモ - マクロ分析(業界別、国別、地域別、テーマ別) - 株式分析、DCF法(現金流割引法)や倍数法の考察、危険信号の検出、投資論文の構築 より高度なイベント駆動型トピック(M&A裁定取引、アクティビズム、経営危機、空売り、スピンオフ)は、ユーザーが明確に要求した場合に株式分析リファレンスで提供されます。 **発動条件:** 決算予想・まとめ、リスク評価、「Xはいくら価値があるのか」、経済見通し、G7、株式分析、評価、競合企業との比較

原文を表示

Bigdata.com MCP workflows plus institutional analysis layers: pre-synthesis EPIC-style filtering, valuation snapshots, earnings quality screens, moat/governance risk, sector KPI lenses. Use for: company briefs, earnings previews/digests, risk assessments, valuation snapshots, investment memos; macro sector/country/regional/thematic analysis; stock analysis, DCF or multiples concepts, red flags, thesis construction. Advanced event-driven topics (M&A arb, activism, distressed, shorts, spin-offs) live in equity-analysis references when users ask explicitly. Triggers: earnings preview/digest, risk assessment, "what is X worth", economic outlook, G7, analyze stock, valuation, peers.

ユースケース
  • 企業価値を評価するとき
  • 利益の信頼度を評価するとき
  • 競争優位性やリスクを分析するとき
  • セクター別のKPIを比較するとき
  • 投資判断をするとき
本文

Bigdata.com financial analysis and equity research

This skill combines structured Bigdata.com workflows (private/public company and macro deliverables) with institutional-style equity analysis (intrinsic value, variant perception, valuation, and quality checks). Use Bigdata.com MCP tools for data; apply the equity layers when the user wants depth beyond a standard template.

Identify the right company

If the user provides a company name, call find_securities first to get the entity id. If the name is ambiguous, respond with:

"I found multiple companies named [X]. Did you mean [Company A] in [Industry] or [Company B] in [Industry]?"

Analysis categories

Read the appropriate reference file for the request:

Category When to use Reference
Public company Briefs, previews, digests, risk, valuation snapshot; always apply references/public_company/analytical-frameworks.md before synthesizing references/public_company/main.md
Private company Upcoming (not-yet-listed) IPOs, S-1/F-1 analysis, planned listings — balanced bull/bear note, no buy/avoid call references/private_company/pre-ipo-analysis.md
Macro economics Sector/country/regional/thematic analysis, rotation, cross-asset views references/macro/main.md
Institutional equity Deep thesis, full DCF/SOTP write-ups, forensic accounting, sector playbooks, advanced special situations references/equity-analysis/main.md

Routing examples

  • "Create an earnings preview for NVIDIA" → Public company
  • "Risk assessment for Tesla" → Public company
  • "What's happening with Apple?" → Public company
  • "Analyze the IPO of [company]", "S-1 analysis", "upcoming listing for [company]" → Private company
  • "Post-IPO day 1 for [company]", "NASDAQ-100 inclusion impact", "180-day lock-up expiry", "366-day founder lock-up / float expansion" → Public company (post-IPO event notes — see references/public_company/post-ipo-common.md)
  • "Analyze the US technology sector" → Macro economics
  • "Economic outlook for Germany" → Macro economics
  • "Compare G7 economies" → Macro economics
  • "Macro analysis of financials in India" → Macro economics
  • "What is Tesla worth?", "valuation snapshot for Apple" → Public company valuation-snapshot.md
  • "DCF on Microsoft", "full sum-of-parts", "M&A arb on [deal]", deep forensic accounting → Institutional equity (often plus public-company data steps)

Data foundation (MCP)

Establish a factual base before deep analysis:

  1. find_securities → entity id and company type (public/private) where applicable
  2. bigdata_company_tearsheet → financials, estimates, sentiment, ESG (when analyzing a specific company)
  3. bigdata_search → news, filings, transcripts, analyst/economic coverage
  4. bigdata_events_calendar → upcoming earnings and conferences (when entity id is available)

For macro / country work, use bigdata_country_tearsheet when available; follow fallbacks in references/macro/main.md.

Core philosophy (full equity thesis / memo)

When producing an investment-style view, anchor on:

  1. Intrinsic value — estimate business value independent of price
  2. Variant perception — state clearly where your view differs from consensus
  3. Quality over quantity — prioritize the few drivers that matter

Earnings preview — mandatory sections

When following references/public_company/earnings-preview.md, treat as mandatory: EPIC table for primary drivers, FaVeS section (Fundamentals / Valuation / Sentiment), Sentiment & positioning data table (tearsheet + search), scenario analysis (bull/base/bear probabilities, prices, probability-weighted EV with math shown), watch-for column on earnings quality, and regulatory/legal search bucket.

Investment thesis workflow (when depth is appropriate)

Use this for comprehensive stock analysis or investment memos—not every brief or digest needs every step.

Step 1: Company and data

Use the Data foundation section above.

Step 2: What matters (EPIC)

Test Question Pass criteria
Effect Is it material? ~10% change moves intrinsic value meaningfully (e.g. >5%)
Predictability Can you forecast it? You have analytical or information edge
Independence Does consensus get it wrong? Market systematically misjudges this
Consensus gap Is there a gap? Your forecast differs meaningfully

Focus on factors that pass all four. Detail: references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/epic-framework.md.

Step 3: Variant perception (FaVeS)

Element Key questions
Fundamentals Which 2–3 KPIs drive value? Where could estimates be wrong?
Valuation What is intrinsic value? What multiple fits quality/growth?
Sentiment What is priced in (e.g. reverse DCF)? How are investors positioned?

You must articulate where you differ from consensus. Detail: references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/faves-framework.md.

Step 4: Quality and risk (before valuation)

Quick earnings quality screen: OCF/NI (healthy typically >0.8; red flag <0.6 or diverging trends); accruals; DSO vs revenue trend.

Competitive position: Moat type/strength (moat taxonomy), ROIC vs WACC, competitive advantage period.

Management: Capital allocation, insider activity, guidance track record (capital allocation).

Step 5: Value and recommend

Company type Primary Secondary check
Stable, profitable DCF (FCFF) EV/EBITDA, P/E
High-growth, pre-profit EV/Revenue; DCF with long CAP Reverse DCF
Bank / insurer P/TBV; dividend discount P/E, residual income
REIT NAV; P/AFFO Implied cap rate
Conglomerate Sum-of-parts Holdco discount
Distressed Liquidation / recovery Asset coverage

Build bull/base/bear with explicit assumptions and probability weights where appropriate.

Output templates (equity-style)

User pattern Template
Comprehensive "analyze [company]" / investment memo assets/templates/investment-memo.md
"Quick view" / "what do you think of [stock]" assets/templates/quick-take.md
Post-earnings reaction note assets/templates/earnings-reaction.md
Pre-IPO / upcoming-listing research note assets/templates/pre-ipo-report-template.md
Post-IPO day-1 reaction note assets/templates/post-ipo-day1-report-template.md
Post-IPO day-14 NASDAQ-100 inclusion note assets/templates/post-ipo-day14-report-template.md
Post-IPO day-179 (180-day lock-up expiry) note assets/templates/post-ipo-day179-report-template.md
Post-IPO day-365 (366-day founder lock-up / float expansion) note assets/templates/post-ipo-day365-report-template.md

Sector playbooks: after you know the industry, use references/equity-analysis/sector-routing.md.

Scripts (optional quantitative helpers)

Default: use bigdata_company_tearsheet, bigdata_search, and workflow steps (including valuation cross-checks and reverse-DCF reasoning) without running local Python.

Use the scripts below only when the user explicitly wants spreadsheet-style model output or offline quant; run from the skill’s scripts/ directory (or paths your environment expects).

Script Purpose When to use
scripts/dcf_model.py DCF with scenarios User asks for built model / explicit scenarios
scripts/reverse_dcf.py Implied growth extraction User asks for scripted reverse DCF
scripts/earnings_quality.py Beneish M-Score, accruals User asks for scripted quality metrics
scripts/peer_comparable.py Comp table User asks for scripted comps
scripts/scenario_probability.py Expected value User asks for scripted EV across scenarios

Quality standards

For investment memo / full thesis-style outputs, include where relevant:

  1. Clear recommendation and conviction (e.g. 1–5)
  2. Explicit variant perception vs consensus
  3. Scenarios with probabilities and price targets (or ranges)
  4. Key risks and what would change the view
  5. Catalysts and timing

For workflow deliverables (brief, preview, digest, risk, valuation snapshot), follow references/public_company/ and references/public_company/main.md universal output quality (PM questions: what’s different, what matters, what to do—no position sizing). Add full thesis elements only when the user asks.

Bars: Full thesis → concise institutional review. Workflow → morning-meeting clarity without data-dump tone.

Capabilities overview

When a user says "Can you help me with a financial report?" or similar, respond with:

I can help automate research workflows and professional deliverables:

Public company — Company briefs, earnings previews/digests, risk assessments, investment-style memos when requested
Macro — Sector analysis, country profiles, regional comparisons, thematic research, rotation, cross-asset angles
Equity depth — Deep valuation write-ups, forensics, sector playbooks, advanced special situations (see equity-analysis index)

Example: "Earnings preview for NVIDIA", "Valuation snapshot for Apple", "Economic outlook for Germany", or "Full DCF thesis for [ticker]."

Universal best practices

  • Before long-form synthesis on a company, read references/public_company/analytical-frameworks.md (EPIC-style filter, 2–3 drivers, quality over quantity).
  • bigdata_search can be used with the company (or topic) in the query; find_securities first when you need a tearsheet or calendar.
  • Use bigdata_company_tearsheet for a financial baseline on a specific entity.
  • Call bigdata_search multiple times with focused queries for coverage.
  • Separate facts from analysis / implications.

Output formats

  • Markdown — Default. At the end, you may ask whether the user wants a report.
  • Word (.docx) — Formal memos.
  • Presentation — Deck-ready structure.
  • Footer — Every workflow deliverable must end with the Powered by Bigdata.com attribution and Disclaimer in assets/templates/report-footer.md (verbatim).

For macro workflows, follow source attribution rules in references/macro/main.md where they apply.

Further reference

Full institutional equity index (valuation, forensics, sectors, advanced special situations): references/equity-analysis/main.md.

原文・著作権は Anthropic および各プラグイン作者に帰属します。日本語訳は Claude API による自動翻訳です。