incident.io のエージェント一式(プラグイン、スキル、接続設定など)の健全性をチェックして、改善すべき点を指摘します。実際の修正は行わず、診断と助言のみを提供します。 次のような場合に使用: ユーザーが incident.io の設定が正常に動いているか、機能が低下していないか、どこを改善できるかを知りたい場合。質問の表現や形式を問わず、1回限りの確認でも定期的な見直しでも対応します。発見された問題は、それぞれ対応する修正ツールへ自動的に案内されます。
Review the health of your incident.io agent estate — plugins, skills, connections — and say what to fix, without fixing anything itself. Use whenever anyone asks whether their incident.io setup is healthy, what's degraded, or what to improve, in any phrasing — one-off or as a recurring review. Every finding routes to the thing that fixes it.
A review, not a repair: doctor reads the estate, ranks what it finds, and hands each finding to the thing that fixes it. It never edits a plugin's tree (skills, README, docs — any file), never re-syncs, never changes a setting, and never writes into the estate — the report itself is handed over, not filed. All of this holds when it runs on a schedule. That's what makes it safe to run weekly and boring to read when everything is fine, which is the goal.
Run all three for a whole-estate review. A named plugin gets the Extensions and Content drift legs; Connections and telemetry contributes only its orient snapshot unless the user asks for that leg. For any other scope, run the legs the user named.
skill-authoring skill's improve job, a structural gap for the extensions skill, a
change in the plugin's repository, or a named dashboard page. Doctor stops at the
hand-off — the report is the run's last act, and acting on a brief is a new job the
user starts, never a continuation of this one.skill-authoring skill's improve reference before reporting an issue as real or
resolved.Setting the estate up or growing it — that's extensions (which routes here for
reviews, as this skill routes there for gaps). Making the edits — that's
skill-authoring. And incident response: doctor reviews the machinery agents use, not
live incidents.
原文・著作権は Anthropic および各プラグイン作者に帰属します。日本語訳は Claude API による自動翻訳です。